Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions being a screen to the process that is scientific

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions being a screen to the process that is scientific

Present Remarks

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this Saturday that is coming August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a weblog about retractions?”

just What has grown to become clear when you look at the intervening nine years is exactly what a rich vein retractions are as tales of what the results are whenever one thing goes incorrect in science. So that as we now have done each year at the moment, we’ll review just what took place within the last few one year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising meth paper to write one on LSD

Evidently meth is just a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have forfeit a 2019 paper on what LSD could harm vision because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the season before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.

The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In line with the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a couple of researchers in Saudi Arabia after getting a complaint that is“serious about the integrity for the information. However the very first writer of the paper pressed right straight back, saying the move had been unjustified.

This article, “Successful usage of mixed corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory polyarteritis that is cutaneous,” had been published by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic operation. It described (with rather grisly images) the actual situation of the 25-year-old guy with severe leg ulcers that solved after the described combination treatment.

But in the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends very first writer of retracted Kumamoto quake paper

The very first writer of a now-retracted paper in technology in regards to the ramifications of the lethal 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan is suspended from their university place for just one year.

Intending Lin, regarding the Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned because of the organization for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism into the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, risky and deceptive” attention research; genetics’ high retraction price

You enjoy our weekly roundup before we present this week’s Weekend Reads, a question: Do? If that’s the case, we’re able to actually make use of your assistance. Can you look at a tax-deductible contribution to help sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: could you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever wished to hone your abilities as a sleuth that is scientific? Now’s your opportunity.

As a result of the United states Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), that is invested in educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.

Take a good look at the image below, and then just simply take our poll. From then on, click the website website website link below to discover the answer that is right.

Share this:

Cock and bull tale results in retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients possessed thing for hybrids (think pets, maybe not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with peoples torsos, winged horses and lions, you receive the image. But a chicken-cow mix wasn’t on that list … until now.

A small grouping of researchers in Brazil has lost a paper in a veterinary log for wanting to reuse information from a chicken research within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

The content, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never impact virus replication,” starred in February into the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information earn fluorosis paper a banner

A article that is recent provided a stark warning in regards to the dangers to kids of fluoride within the nation’s water happens to be tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of a unique paper which undermines the dependability for the initial information.

This article, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health surveys: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a dental log. The author that is first the paper is Christopher Neurath, for the United states Environmental Health research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

The content, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) when it comes to years 2011 and 2012, reported increases that are“large severity and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to to the mid-1980s.

Based on the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational industries, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: just How did this “pure, utter nonsense” get into in a peer-reviewed log?

Often, a paper arrives that is therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore as opposed to you will need to do justice to a recent paper in Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs right right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

A write-up claiming to uproot the tree that is evolutionary of has gotten a manifestation of concern after an audience notified the log about prospective issues with the info.

This article, “Phylogenomic analysis of the putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech evolution,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 of the 12 months. In line with the authors — a worldwide group that includes scientists in the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the North Carolina Museum best website to write your essay of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *