- Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
- Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
- Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD
We’re on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
Nine years back this Saturday that is coming August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a weblog about retractions?”
just What has grown to become clear when you look at the intervening nine years is exactly what a rich vein retractions are as tales of what the results are whenever one thing goes incorrect in science. So that as we now have done each year at the moment, we’ll review just what took place within the last few one year.
Drug researchers trip up, raising meth paper to write one on LSD
Evidently meth is just a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.
Scientists in Asia have forfeit a 2019 paper on what LSD could harm vision because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the season before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.
The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In line with the article:
Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper
A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a couple of researchers in Saudi Arabia after getting a complaint that is“serious about the integrity for the information. Continue reading “Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions being a screen to the process that is scientific”