These pages shows a essay that is whole an example of simple tips to structure your articles

These pages shows a essay that is whole an example of simple tips to structure your articles

Example academic essay

Example essay that is academic The Death Penalty. This essay shows many important features which commonly appear in essays.

Should the death penalty be restored in the UK?

The restoration of this death penalty for serious crimes is an issue of debate in britain due to the recent increase in violent crime. The complexities, effects and methods to the nagging problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues that are further complicated in addition that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime so that you can increase circulation and this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will examine this topic firstly by thinking about the arguments put forward by those in favour associated with death penalty and then by studying the arguments opposed to the concept.

The primary arguments in favour of restoring the death penalty are the ones of deterrence and retribution: the theory is the fact that people will be dissuaded from violent crime if they know they’re going to face the ultimate punishment and therefore people should face the same treatment which they gave out to others. Statistics show that after the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we need to consider the possibility that other reasons might have lead to this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims that it is impractical to prove that capital punishment is a higher deterrent than being given a full life sentence in prison and that “evidence….gives no support towards the evidence hypothesis theory.” It appears at the best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The thought of ‘retribution’ is a fascinating one: there was a appeal that is basic the simple phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument as he says that killers give up their rights if they kill and therefore if punishments are too lenient then it demonstrates that we undervalue the ability to live. There are other points too in support of the death penalty, one of these cost that is being. It is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for a long time at a stretch.

The arguments resistant to the death penalty are mainly ethical in their nature, it is basically wrong to kill and that once the state kills it sends out of the wrong message towards the remaining portion of the country. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people genuinely believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. This might be an argument that is interesting would you teach children never to hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead show them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There is the fact you could execute innocent people. Innocent people can always be released from prison, nonetheless they can’t ever be brought back from the dead. When people have already been killed there is no possibility of rehabilitation or criminals trying to make up for crimes. For this good reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).

In conclusion, the arguments put forward by people who support or are contrary to the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences together with real way folks are brought up consequently they are unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments essay-911.com sign up. It really is interesting that in this country most people are in favour of the death penalty yet parliament will continue to oppose it. In this case it might be argued that parliament is in the lead in upholding human rights and will continue to broadcast the clear message that killing is obviously wrong.

You ought to be in a position to note that this essay is made of:

An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why the subject is relevant and interesting.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the problems and issues mixed up in topic.
3. An outline of the essay.

Main paragraphs with:
1. An interest sentence which gives a idea/argument that is main tells us what the entire paragraph is mostly about.
2. Evidence from outside sources which support the argument(s) put forward within the topic sentence.
3. Some input that is personal the author analysing the points put forward into the topic sentence plus the outside sources.

A conclusion:
Summarises the main points and gives an answer into the question.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *